Nomos lab / public results

We test ideas
on real hardware.

Four public technical reports on satellite observability and onboard computing. Read the result first, then open the paper, evidence, code, citation, or interactive tool directly.

4 technical reports 3 physical ground studies 1 interactive workbench All evidence downloadable

Research library

Every report includes its paper, citation, evidence package, and checksums. None are flight results or peer reviewed.

Nomos-TR-2026-02 · Physical Jetson study

Ground Validation of Model-Tier Inference

We trained two satellite-image models, ran them on an 8 GB Jetson Orin Nano, and measured the accuracy, speed, and energy tradeoff.

In plain EnglishThe larger model was a little more accurate and used more energy. Neither choice was always best, so an onboard scheduler may have a real decision to make.
+0.926accuracy points gained
26.9%energy increase
2useful model choices
Nomos-TR-2026-01 · Compute-HIL simulation

Beyond DVFS: Queue-Stable Model-Tier Selection

We tested whether a controller could switch model sizes as power and workload changed, without letting the processing queue grow out of control.

In plain EnglishWhen compute became overloaded and missing work was expensive, switching model size helped. When the system had spare capacity, it made no difference.
12/60cells won against baseline
48/60cells tied
0losses
How to read these

A bench test is not a flight test.

Each experiment answers one narrow question. It does not prove that the system works on a spacecraft or solves an operator's problem.

Hardware bench

The code and models run on a real Jetson development board. The failures are safely isolated test failures.

Simulation

The model really runs, but power, workload, and timing conditions come from a fixed simulation.

Still unknown

How this fits commercial flight computers, operator workflows, private telemetry, and real spacecraft constraints.