Onboard VLM accuracy, cost, and policy behavior
We put two open vision-language models on an 8 GB Jetson, showed each one 100 aerial images, and separated visual recognition from mission-policy behavior.
Four public technical reports on satellite observability and onboard computing. Read the result first, then open the paper, evidence, code, citation, or interactive tool directly.
Every report includes its paper, citation, evidence package, and checksums. None are flight results or peer reviewed.
We put two open vision-language models on an 8 GB Jetson, showed each one 100 aerial images, and separated visual recognition from mission-policy behavior.
An anomaly detector can flag a change without knowing why it happened. This report tests the missing evidence layer, then challenges four small models to keep their answers tied to proof.
We trained two satellite-image models, ran them on an 8 GB Jetson Orin Nano, and measured the accuracy, speed, and energy tradeoff.
We tested whether a controller could switch model sizes as power and workload changed, without letting the processing queue grow out of control.
Each experiment answers one narrow question. It does not prove that the system works on a spacecraft or solves an operator's problem.
The code and models run on a real Jetson development board. The failures are safely isolated test failures.
The model really runs, but power, workload, and timing conditions come from a fixed simulation.
How this fits commercial flight computers, operator workflows, private telemetry, and real spacecraft constraints.